On Tue, 24 Feb 2009, David Van Horn wrote: > Brian Harvey wrote: >> We now have the macro tail wagging the Scheme dog. > > Other than the absence of a specified REPL semantics in R6RS (which > appears to be an omission that can be addressed by a SRFI or future > Scheme standard), I don't see evidence of this. > > Could you be more specific? >
http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/will/R6RS/essay.txt -elf _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
