On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 05:35:06 -0400, Derick Eddington
<[email protected]> wrote:
> The eval approach could be made to work by following the predicate I
> posted. It would buy needing to specially handle a few less identifiers
> and not needing the tiny auxiliary libraries. Some people might not
> like using eval when libraries can do it.
If there were nested module forms in R6RS, then I might be one of those
people who would not wish to use EVAL in this case. But having top-level
modules like these sitting around doesn't suit me that well, so I tend to
think I'd prefer the EVAL approach in this case.
Sincerely,
Aaron W. Hsu
--
Of all tyrannies, a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its
victims may be the most oppressive. -- C. S. Lewis
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
