On Mon, 2009-08-31 at 13:55 -0700, Joe Marshall wrote: > Yes, but it seems that the SRFIs themselves should be weighted in some > way. For instance, SRFI 6 (Basic String Ports) is nearly universal, so an > implementation that omitted SRFI 6 should be penalized. But SRFI 21 is > only supported by Gambit.
"penalize"? Ok, so you're on some kind of juridical mission I guess. You're implementing some program of "surveille and punish" - that is, your exercise has the form of a power play. What's your goal? -t _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
