On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 4:18 AM, David Rush<[email protected]> wrote: > For what it's worth, My "Metric A" would have Gambit, Larceny, Stalin, > and maybe Chicken in the top tier. All of those Implementations have > made *significant* technical contributions to understanding the > essence of the language and its implementation. If you wish to include > moribund Implementations then you;d have to include Rabbit and T. This > is opposed to PLT, which, IMO has made very large strides in > demonstrating the *application* of Scheme's principles to practical > programming (an exercise any competent engineer should be able to > perform).
What are some other good examples of competent application of Scheme's principles to practical programming? _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
