Grant Rettke scripsit: > There is a lot of talk from a users perspective, but from an > implementers perspective (other than what Joe mentioned), nothing is > jumping out at least based on the landscape today.
The implementers are the servants of the users, and so are the standards committees. What the users want, the implementers and standards committees should find a way to provide, if not necessarily the way the users expected. It's true that in the past Scheme has been standardized basically by self-selected implementers. I have good reasons to believe that that will change this time. > Which Schemes will lead the aforementioned pack towards R7RS > (regardless of who are leaders by use or popularity)? Nobody can say that until the content of R7RS is known. -- John Cowan http://ccil.org/~cowan [email protected] Mr. Henry James writes fiction as if it were a painful duty. --Oscar Wilde _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
