William D Clinger wrote: > John Cowan wrote: >> Procedure introspection is something that historically Scheme has lacked. >> It's an interesting idea, but would need to be worked out further before >> it was ripe for standardization. Consider writing a SRFI. I'm told >> that Chez, MIT Scheme, and Scheme48 are relevant prior art. > > Starting at > > http://larceny.ccs.neu.edu/doc/user-manual.html#id2536543 > > Skip down to the "Note". There you find lightly edited text from > my "straw proposal" of 13 years ago.
I think procedure arity inspection is ripe (and long overdue) for a SRFI proposal. I'm willing to review the implementations and write up a proposal. If anyone would like to contribute to that effort, just send me email. David _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
