On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 6:00 PM, Brian Harvey<[email protected]> wrote: > I think (but I'm not 100% sure) that both of these disagreements come from > the same root cause: You think of a procedure as a way to get a computer > to do something, and I think of a procedure as the closest we can get in > this imperfect world to the Platonic ideal of a procedure, which is a > mathematical function. Functions have one return value, by definition.
Is continuation passing style is an acceptable substitute for multiple return values? _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
