2009/9/6 Aaron W. Hsu <[email protected]>: > On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 23:18:25 -0400, Ray Dillinger <[email protected]> wrote: > Just as we don't always > use (lambda args ...),
D'oh! > and instead use the syntactic means of binding them > without exposing the intermediate list structure, But we pay that price quite regularly. There is no way to destructure that arg list without doing violence to the return continuation semantics. Following this thread has just about entirely convinced me to be in favor of first-class environments, because that is *exactly* what we manipulate when the destructuring implicit in a (LAMBDA (x y) ...) form. > multiple return values Remain unnecessary in such a Scheme, however. :) david rush -- GPG Public key at http://cyber-rush.org/drr/gpg-public-key.txt _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
