Brian Mastenbrook scripsit: > In the example, I showed how a separate-instantiation implementation > would re-instantiate the previous top-level-program-as-library when > entering a new top-level program which imports the previous top-level > program.
And a really beautiful example it is, too. I would really like to know how it is that R6RS top-level programs are different in their semantics from R5RS programs, though. I'm told there's a difference, but I don't see it (apart from the question of imports, to be sure). Can someone explain that to me? -- Only do what only you can do. John Cowan <[email protected]> --Edsger W. Dijkstra's advice to a student in search of a thesis _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
