Arthur A. Gleckler scripsit: > +1. > > MIT Scheme also supports this syntax.
The R6RS rationale says that this is "a popular choice" among R5RS implementations. To my mind, what is popular and not obviously broken should be a candidate for standardization, so I have added |...| to the lexical syntax features at http://tinyurl.com/thing-one. -- John Cowan [email protected] http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Most languages are dramatically underdescribed, and at least one is dramatically overdescribed. Still other languages are simultaneously overdescribed and underdescribed. Welsh pertains to the third category. --Alan King _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
