> I have come up with a proposal for mildly extensible lexical syntax I have no argument with the details of the notation, but could you please provide some explanation for why you think this belongs in Small Scheme? As you point out, it solves a limited class of problems, rather than elucidating the practical working out of some brilliant general principle.
_______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
