On Sep 13, 2009, at 3:03 PM, Abdulaziz Ghuloum wrote:
> Having read/write invariant on gensyms has nothing to do with whether
> a call to gensym returns a fresh symbol or not (the reader does not
> have to call gensym when it reads #{foo bar}, instead, it may consult
> the "gensym table" first).
Since I managed to confuse two people with my wording here: this is
the point I was intending to make; readable gensyms ala Chez and
Ikarus are *not* broken.
--
Brian Mastenbrook
[email protected]
http://brian.mastenbrook.net/
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
