On Sun, 13 Sep 2009, Brian Mastenbrook wrote: > On Sep 13, 2009, at 3:47 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote: > >> By following the example of R6RS and declaring it to be an error. > > > Did you try that code in any implementation of the R6RS?
Yes, I wrote the implementation of macros and modules for R6RS Larceny. The examples are from the tests for R6RS compliance that come with the implementation, and describes the behavior of Larceny. R6RS declares them to be errors but for technical reasons does not require implementations to raise these errors, it only encourages them to do so. To my knowledde, Larceny is the only implementation complying with the R6RS recommendation. Andre _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
