On Sep 13, 2009, at 10:55 PM, Andre van Tonder wrote:
> No, I think that kind of thing should be required to be an error
> in 1-pass, since it would break the usual lexical scope.
If you think
(let-syntax ((f (syntax-rules () ((_) 1))))
(let ()
(define (g) (f))
(define (f) 2)
(g)))
should be an error, do you also think that
(let ([f (lambda () 1)])
(let ()
(define (g) (f))
(define (f) 2)
(g)))
should also be an error?
Aziz,,,
_______________________________________________
r6rs-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
