On 13 Oct 2009, at 4:07 pm, John Cowan wrote: > Alaric Snell-Pym scripsit: > >> Ah-hah. So having feature groups separate like that is a way to allow >> programmers to omit to declare their requirements in order to create >> code that may break unexpectedly? :-) > > Pretty much. Look how things work today:
Ok, I can accept that as "no worse than today", but under duress: it sucks to have feature groups need their own special syntax, when modules are just fine. How about letting implementations provide the symbols defined by feature-modules by default, making importing them optional? ABS -- Alaric Snell-Pym Work: http://www.snell-systems.co.uk/ Play: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/alaric/ Blog: http://www.snell-pym.org.uk/archives/author/alaric/ _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
