Ray Dillinger scripsit: > In the case of the decidedly odd scheme which can load support > for a usually-built-in feature group on demand, "import" is > exactly the right thing. In the case of the usual scheme which > has the feature built-in, an instant return is indistinguishable > from a successful import as far as the code is concerned. In > case of an implementation restriction, the fast-fail is certainly > no worse than the alternative.
Your argument is convincing. When I get a chance, I'll switch the feature groups to modules. However, unlike standard modules, whatever "special modules" (need a better name) the implementation provides built-in will be visible in the default namespace without actually requiring an import. -- As we all know, civil libertarians are not John Cowan the friskiest group around --comes from [email protected] forever being on the qui vive for the sound http://www.ccil.org/~cowan of jack-booted fascism coming down the pike. --Molly Ivins _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
