On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Thomas Lord <[email protected]> wrote: > It's conservative and incremental because it just floats > some existing elements of the semantics into first-class > values. It's practical because, well, it's been done more > than once.
That's not conservative. Once such things are first-class values, they're hard to remove, even if there's a strong consensus that they were a mistake. And I thought that there already was reasonable, but not perfect, consensus that they were a mistake. _______________________________________________ r6rs-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.r6rs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/r6rs-discuss
