I wonder how much trouble it would cause if there was a unified syntax which considered a directory as a (standardized) module.
In: foo/bar/bah "bar" might be a directory "pseudo module" or a real module. I guess it would be possible to define two submodules with the same name (once in a file, and once in the filesystem). A rule would be needed to make one of these primary, and the other shadowed. When I first started using submodules, I intuitively assumed this unified syntax, and had to refer to the manual to figure out the real one. -- Anthony Carrico -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/559BFD51.9000808%40memebeam.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
