I wonder how much trouble it would cause if there was a unified syntax which considered a directory as a (standardized) module.
In: foo/bar/bah "bar" might be a directory "pseudo module" or a real module. I guess it would be possible to define two submodules with the same name (once in a file, and once in the filesystem). A rule would be needed to make one of these primary, and the other shadowed. When I first started using submodules, I intuitively assumed this unified syntax, and had to refer to the manual to figure out the real one. -- Anthony Carrico -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to racket-dev@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/559BFD51.9000808%40memebeam.org. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
