On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 12:24 PM, Anthony Carrico <[email protected]> wrote:
> I wonder how much trouble it would cause if there was a unified syntax > which considered a directory as a (standardized) module. > > In: > > foo/bar/bah > > "bar" might be a directory "pseudo module" or a real module. I guess it > would be possible to define two submodules with the same name (once in a > file, and once in the filesystem). A rule would be needed to make one of > these primary, and the other shadowed. > For what it's worth, Rust does something like this for its module system. See the "Multiple file crates" section here: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/book/crates-and-modules.html -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAKUgKwyXUNtNSWAodM2f-VUQMkBTRYySsfNFNYhN7w%2B_F4p9Yg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
