David Bremner <[email protected]> writes: > A helpful sysadmin (hi pabs!) ran the command on the autobuilder as well, and > got > _almost_ the same output. > > It most likely is significant that the gcc version is different. I'll > try upgrading the porterbox chroot and see if it duplicates the > autobuilder failure. >
I managed this earlier than expected, and indeed I can confirm the jit buffer overflow in racketcgc is repeatable on the porterbox (even the address that triggers the error is the same) in my experiments. So in principle I could run racketcgc under gdb, if it would help. Sorry for making this more complicated than necessary, I missed the variation in gcc version. In some sense it's a blessing that the crash is more deterministic under gcc 5.3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/874mfog6pf.fsf%40maritornes.cs.unb.ca. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
