At Sat, 12 Dec 2015 15:41:39 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> writes: > > > Meanwhile, commit c6b8ba7c4a is another shot (still mostly in the dark) > > at this problem. It might work to try it as a patch: > > > > > https://github.com/racket/racket/commit/c6b8ba7c4a40e9a0933df2661332167d55c8bf8 > 0.patch > > This yields the same abort as before (at jit.c:2588). Expanding the > to 200 buffer seemed to work. Should I just patch the Debian package, or > do you want to adjust the ifdef in jit.h?
I'm glad we've found something that has an effect, but I'm puzzled by the need for a larger amount of JIT-buffer padding. The fact that the problem shows up after upgrading the compiler makes me worry that the JIT is doing something undefined at the C level. Does compiling with `-fno-strict-aliasing` have any effect? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/566c89e2.8a0e430a.87ad9.ffffa7c8SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
