At Thu, 11 May 2017 18:38:00 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> If the name isn’t fixed, #:no-proxy-allowed would be my preference. 

We haven't been using the word "proxy" in this context, but I can see
why you'd want something that more clearly connects to
"impersonator"/"chaperone" terminology. (I haven't been sure that
disallowing impersonators/chaperones would be the only implication of
the property, but that seems to be the case, so far.)

Also, I'd prefer an adjective, but `#:nonimpersonatable` is awkward.

Any other suggestions?

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/5915b5a2.c68d620a.c7f2.7b01SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to