#:non-chaperoned #:adult :(
> On May 12, 2017, at 9:16 AM, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > > At Thu, 11 May 2017 18:38:00 -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote: >> If the name isn’t fixed, #:no-proxy-allowed would be my preference. > > We haven't been using the word "proxy" in this context, but I can see > why you'd want something that more clearly connects to > "impersonator"/"chaperone" terminology. (I haven't been sure that > disallowing impersonators/chaperones would be the only implication of > the property, but that seems to be the case, so far.) > > Also, I'd prefer an adjective, but `#:nonimpersonatable` is awkward. > > Any other suggestions? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/5915b5a2.c68d620a.c7f2.7b01SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING%40gmr-mx.google.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/7FFFD102-9818-42D6-836C-6ED6A8A3DA83%40ccs.neu.edu. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
