On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 10:38 AM Joshua Judson Rosen < rozzin.rac...@hackerposse.com> wrote:
> I also had found that "The Racket Virtual Machine and Randomized Testing" > essay-- > the big question there, after skimming and scanning, was basically to what > extent > that depiction of Racket is still accurate (I didn't see a date in the > paper itself, > but I gathered from that the accompanying README said "known to work with > Racket v5.0.2", > and that the timestamps in the tarball were from 2010, that it's just shy > of a decade old). > > I'm reading your response as indicating that the only changes in the VM > over the last decade have basically been bugfixes and maybe > performance-improvements-- > that the type of bytecode and interpretation basically haven't changed > since you worked > on that paper. > I don't know enough to comment on the bigger picture, but I remembered Matthew's announcement from 2018 ( https://groups.google.com/d/topic/racket-dev/UTCAA_wPkc4/discussion) that the bytecode validator was being retired. -Philip -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/racket-dev/CAH3z3gbTtjddB6rwgmjqAWHoBxJFBdMgP9bSF5XtQeXRTJYBNw%40mail.gmail.com.
