But it could be elided for the docs. Robby
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:33 AM, J. Ian Johnson <[email protected]> wrote: > I imagine that's there more for Typed Racket's sake. > -Ian > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Pierpaolo Bernardi" <[email protected]> > To: "Neil Toronto" <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:17:57 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern > Subject: Re: [racket] Math library ready for testing > > On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Neil Toronto <[email protected]> wrote: >> I've just pushed the last commits that make the new math library ready for >> wider testing. Almost everything ready for use is documented, the tests keep >> passing, and everything *seems* to work. > > (max-math-threads) → Positive-Integer > (max-math-threads num) → void? > num : Positive-Integer > > The maximum number of threads a parallelized math function will use. > The default value is (max 1 (processor-count))." > > Isn't (max 1 (processor-count)) the same as (processor-count) ? > > Or does Racket runs on machines with less than 1 processors? 8^) > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users > > ____________________ > Racket Users list: > http://lists.racket-lang.org/users ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
