Using this thread is fine, because I'm monitoring it closely.

If you're not sure whether some behavior is an error, email the list. Even if you're wrong, you're not wrong: if you misunderstood something, it's probably the documentation's fault. Also, other people probably misunderstood it in the same way, so resolving it in public is good.

Otherwise, submit a bug report. Here, the word "bug" means "bug the person responsible," which ensures the *error* will get fixed. :D

Neil ⊥

On 12/12/2012 09:35 AM, Pierpaolo Bernardi wrote:
Should I use the bug reporting machinery for small things like this
one, which I assume there will be a bunch in the new docs?

Better a private mail to Neil?

P.


On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 4:58 PM, Neil Toronto <[email protected]> wrote:
I'll fix the type of `processor-count' and change the math docs.

Neil ⊥


On 12/12/2012 08:16 AM, Robby Findler wrote:

But it could be elided for the docs.

Robby

On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 8:33 AM, J. Ian Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

I imagine that's there more for Typed Racket's sake.
-Ian
----- Original Message -----
From: "Pierpaolo Bernardi" <[email protected]>
To: "Neil Toronto" <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2012 9:17:57 AM GMT -05:00 US/Canada
Eastern
Subject: Re: [racket] Math library ready for testing

On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 9:33 PM, Neil Toronto <[email protected]>
wrote:

I've just pushed the last commits that make the new math library ready
for
wider testing. Almost everything ready for use is documented, the tests
keep
passing, and everything *seems* to work.


          (max-math-threads) → Positive-Integer
          (max-math-threads num) → void?
            num : Positive-Integer

          The maximum number of threads a parallelized math function will
use.
          The default value is (max 1 (processor-count))."

Isn't (max 1 (processor-count)) the same as (processor-count) ?

Or does Racket runs on machines with less than 1 processors?   8^)

____________________
    Racket Users list:
    http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

____________________
    Racket Users list:
    http://lists.racket-lang.org/users


____________________
    Racket Users list:
    http://lists.racket-lang.org/users


____________________
  Racket Users list:
  http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

____________________
 Racket Users list:
 http://lists.racket-lang.org/users

Reply via email to