Yes. If you mean that more of Racket itself (such as cm) should use define-logger, I think you have a good point.
There are things like GC that have been using the global logger "forever". Maybe changing those would be too difficult. Or perhaps (although it's harder for me to imagine) changing those could break something that expects the old behavior (??). But very recently added log messages probably wouldn't fall into that category, and could/should use their own logger. On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 11:06 AM, Tony Garnock-Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > On 02/13/2013 08:47 AM, Greg Hendershott wrote: >> >> 5.3.2 lets you use a new `define-logger' form to define a named >> logger, and change the log-xxx calls to use that logger instead of the >> main/default one. > > > Understood, and that's a tenable workaround - but should these "file > dependency" messages be appearing at the toplevel logger at all? > > Tony ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
