At Wed, 13 Feb 2013 14:02:21 -0500, Greg Hendershott wrote: > Yes. If you mean that more of Racket itself (such as cm) should use > define-logger, I think you have a good point. > > There are things like GC that have been using the global logger > "forever". Maybe changing those would be too difficult. Or perhaps > (although it's harder for me to imagine) changing those could break > something that expects the old behavior (??).
We already changed some. The GC messages, for example, go to a logger named `GC'. I'm not sure whether there are others besides CM accomplices that need to change. ____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
