At Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:03:18 +0100, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > I think I'm going about this the wrong way. > > What I wanted to do was switch from LaTeX (before I had to learn to much), > to racket (still learning), but bring a nice package I had from latex[1]. > I did try dropping the location of my tma.sty code into your example[2], > but assuming 'its all just LaTex/Tex' seems to be wrong as the error[0] I > get tells me that my LaTeX definitions are missing when pdfLaTeX tries to > make the PDF.
Unfortunately, it will be difficult to customize Scribble's Latex-based
output without understanding Latex. Maybe we can get you just far
enough with this customization...
To answer your original question: Yes, you can use
`make-latex-defaults` that way. Instead of using `part` directly, it's
easiest to use `title`, so that you don't have to fill in all the
fields of `part`.
Another piece of the puzzle is that `\myname`, etc., need to appear in
the Latex output before the title. A Scribble paragraph with the
'pretitle style property will do that.
The enclosed "latex-default-ex.scrbl" illustrates.
Normally, I'd expect `make-text-addition` to work in the way that
Matthias suggested, which would mean this simplification of
"latex-default-ex.scrbl":
@(define tma-style
(style
#f
(list
(make-tex-addition #"\\usepackage{cancel}\\usepackage{tma}"))))
But `make-tex-addition` causes "tma.sty" to be pulled in later, and
apparently that conflicts with one of the packages that Scribble uses.
Such is life with Latex, and the simplification doesn't work.
latex-default-ex.scrbl
Description: Binary data
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
