Thank you Matthew, As usual you have been very kind.
I've been able to modify your example to easily produce exactly what I need. It has also been a very useful example to learn from. Kind regards Stephen On Saturday, 11 October 2014, Matthew Flatt <[email protected]> wrote: > At Fri, 10 Oct 2014 17:03:18 +0100, Stephen De Gabrielle wrote: > > I think I'm going about this the wrong way. > > > > What I wanted to do was switch from LaTeX (before I had to learn to > much), > > to racket (still learning), but bring a nice package I had from latex[1]. > > I did try dropping the location of my tma.sty code into your example[2], > > but assuming 'its all just LaTex/Tex' seems to be wrong as the error[0] I > > get tells me that my LaTeX definitions are missing when pdfLaTeX tries to > > make the PDF. > > Unfortunately, it will be difficult to customize Scribble's Latex-based > output without understanding Latex. Maybe we can get you just far > enough with this customization... > > To answer your original question: Yes, you can use > `make-latex-defaults` that way. Instead of using `part` directly, it's > easiest to use `title`, so that you don't have to fill in all the > fields of `part`. > > Another piece of the puzzle is that `\myname`, etc., need to appear in > the Latex output before the title. A Scribble paragraph with the > 'pretitle style property will do that. > > The enclosed "latex-default-ex.scrbl" illustrates. > > > Normally, I'd expect `make-text-addition` to work in the way that > Matthias suggested, which would mean this simplification of > "latex-default-ex.scrbl": > > @(define tma-style > (style > #f > (list > (make-tex-addition #"\\usepackage{cancel}\\usepackage{tma}")))) > > But `make-tex-addition` causes "tma.sty" to be pulled in later, and > apparently that conflicts with one of the packages that Scribble uses. > Such is life with Latex, and the simplification doesn't work. > -- Sent from Gmail Mobile
____________________ Racket Users list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/users
