Vincent St-Amour <stamo...@ccs.neu.edu> writes: > I have written GUI applications in Racket, .NET, Swing and tk, and > Racket is the most pleasant by far, IMO.
I'm glad to hear it. Racket, as language, really looks beautiful - simple syntax and powerful expressibility, afaict. Do you find Racket's GUI sufficient for desktop appps? > > Racket performance is pretty good in general. The Racket performance > docs have more information: Thank you, I'll take a look. > Realm of Racket is very good, and since you already have programming > experience, you should be able to pick it up easily. Thank you. > If you need a gentler introduction to thinking functionally, I would > recommend How to Design Programs: That what I'm reading atm while considering whether to buy ebook or paperback version of RoR. Sincerely, Gour -- One is understood to be in full knowledge whose every endeavor is devoid of desire for sense gratification. He is said by sages to be a worker for whom the reactions of work have been burned up by the fire of perfect knowledge. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
