Tony Garnock-Jones wrote on 05/03/2015 03:10 PM:
On 2015-05-03 2:50 PM, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
128 RAM and 128 NAND flash, albeit with a different SoC with lower
CPU clock rate. I don't want to rely on USB Storage for this
project.
I should mention also that I couldn't do anything useful with Racket 5.x
(as it was at the time) on the WNDR3700v2 without using a swap file on a
USB stick (!). Simply not enough RAM or storage for Racket.
Very good to know. Guess I'll just target the 128MB RAM devices, and
not even bother with 64MB. This weekend I'm writing a (hopefully)
very-small-footprint HTTP-serving module in pure Racket.
Neil V.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket
Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
