This appears to be a bug -- my guess is that the contract isn't actually generated, and thus turns into `#f` -- that's what `require/typed` expands to, before TR inserts the real contract.
Sam On Fri, May 8, 2015 at 5:26 PM, Alexander D. Knauth <alexan...@knauth.org> wrote: > I have this file: > #lang typed/racket > (provide x) > (define x : Natural 3) > (module* main racket/base > (require typed/racket/base) > (require/typed (submod "..") > [x Natural])) > > I get this strange error message: > . . ../../../../../Applications/Racket/April-24/Racket > v6.2.0.2/collects/racket/contract/private/blame.rkt:143:0: x: broke its > contract > promised: #f > produced: 3 > in: #f > contract from: (interface for x) > blaming: (interface for x) > (assuming the contract is correct) > at: /Users/Alex/Documents/DrRacket/tr-submod-error/lib.rkt:7.18 > > What? > > I just realized I meant to use require/untyped-contract instead of > require/typed, but still, what? > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
