OK, instead of "doc.scrbl", I'll have "<packagename>.scrbl".
Is it OK if I *exclude* the HTML rendering of the docs from the files included in the packaging altogether (which would give me the below files)? * info.rkt (the usual) * somepackage.rkt (the full implementation with embedded docs, for my packages) * main.rkt (the PLaneT-like `require` wrapper for the package/collection) * somepackage.scrbl (the complete documentation Scribble file generated from embedded docs with a tool that is not included in the package) (I'm leaning towards excluding HTML rendered documentation from the package, because I dislike all the CSS/JS files. And I'm probably going to use a modified HTML rendering for the package Web home pages anyway, rather than let the latest version of HTTP(S)-hosted package double as the home page, though I do like the simplicity of not having to host a separate home page. I assume no one wants a nonstandard HTML rendering in the package files.) Neil V. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
