On Friday, December 11, 2015 at 9:06:16 AM UTC-5, Matthew Flatt wrote: > Jay's explanation sounds right to me. > > Naturally, we've wanted to move more code out of C for a long time. I > think the pieces are finally moving into place so that it will really > start to happen over the next year or so (but it's always difficult to > predict). > > FWIW, I'm puzzled by the behavior of `find . -name \*.rkt | xargs wc`, > but using > > (for/fold ([n 0]) ([f (in-directory)] > #:when (regexp-match? #rx"[.]rkt$" f)) > (+ n (length (file->lines f)))) > > on the v6.3 source distribution, I get > > .c: 308,651 (where roughly 10% is a GC that we don't use anymore) > .h: 54,424 > .rkt: 823,030
I think maybe an xargs limit is being reached or something - when I scroll up, I see another total line is displayed for .rkt, so it's: 779,431 43,544 For a total of 822,975 Racket lines. Sorry for the confusion. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
