>
> FWIW, http://www.dwheeler.com/sloccount/ might be a better way to
> accomplish this once it supports Racket detection. I just opened a feature
> request for that at
> https://sourceforge.net/p/sloccount/feature-requests/20/ and am hoping
> there is interest.
>

You could also use sloc [1], which already supports Racket. Or just trust
github's count (47.6% Racket, 34% C at [2])

[1] https://github.com/flosse/sloc
[2] https://github.com/racket/racket

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to