On Sun, May 1, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Matthew Butterick <m...@mbtype.com> wrote: > > While `syntax-local-introduce` now makes more sense to me, I still find it > weird. Because is `syntax-local-introduce` hygienic? Well it doesn't seem > UN-hygienic, inasmuch as it's not creating identifiers at the calling site. > But by pruning the last scope, `syntax-local-introduce` is making an > identifier appear as if it belongs to strange penumbral area of the > macro-definition site that isn't otherwise accessible. Semihygienic?
No, `syntax-local-introduce` is not hygenic. It's basically "pretend that this identifier was in the input", which is fundamentally unhygenic. Sam -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
