> On Jun 29, 2016, at 9:05 AM, Shakna Israel <s4b...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm trying to introduce an implicit binding for require.
>
> One of the features I love about Python, is the namespace binding.
>
> import sys
>
> sys.stdout.write("Sweet")
>
> I know this can also be accomplished with require by specifying a prefix-in,
> or a prefix-out with a local-require.
>
> However, I want a require that does that for me.
>
> (require racket/base)
> (racket/base:println "It works!")
Would something like
(require syntax/parse/define (for-syntax racket/base racket/syntax))
(begin-for-syntax
(define-syntax-class path
[pattern path:id #:with prefix (format-id #'path "~a:" #'path)]))
(define-simple-macro (new-require path:path ...)
(require (prefix-in path.prefix path.path) ...))
Work for you?
> Figuring the namespace mangling is simple enough.
>
> However, for this to work, I think I need a require transformer, but I'm at a
> loss. The only example I see can mess with the module path, but not the
> symbols it exposes.
>
> Any pointers?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
