On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 09:34:28AM -0400, Matthias Felleisen wrote:
> 
> > On Aug 22, 2016, at 12:59 AM, William G Hatch <will...@hatch.uno> wrote:
> > 
> >  is scsh what you consider natural?
> 
> 
> Iā€™d like two different entry points: 
> 
> ā€” one for people who program in zsh, bash, tcsh, csh, sh, and perhaps even 
> more primitive things (if they exist); scsh syntax appeals to those 
> ā€” one for people like me who write Racket programs for their shell-like needs 
> (HtDP/2e has several large script like that) 
> 
> And of course, the ideal world has a path to go back and forth from these 
> points. ā€” Matthias, who always dreams of every thing 

This reminds me of Scribble, which has two syntaxes:  one that looks like (and 
is) 
Scheme, and one that's just ordinary text with a bit of markup..

-- hendrik

> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Racket Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to