I would do something like: (define ch (make-channel)) (submit-job! jq (lambda () (define ans ...) (channel-put ch ans))) (channel-get ch ans)
This will synchronously wait for the job to finish. Presumably you'd do this when you already started up the workers and from a context where you have a lot of jobs running. Jay On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Dan Liebgold <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 10:38:05 AM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote: >> The typed-racket code returns a value from the job, whereas this code >> assumes the job is fully self-contained. Perhaps job-queue should >> protect itself from job exceptions. >> > > BTW, how would you recommend returning a value from a job in job-queue? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- Jay McCarthy Associate Professor PLT @ CS @ UMass Lowell http://jeapostrophe.github.io "Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing, for ye are laying the foundation of a great work. And out of small things proceedeth that which is great." - D&C 64:33 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
