(And you also want to catch all exns at that points and put them into ch. But I suspect you’d have known.)
> On Feb 2, 2017, at 9:11 AM, Jay McCarthy <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would do something like: > > (define ch (make-channel)) > (submit-job! jq (lambda () (define ans ...) (channel-put ch ans))) > (channel-get ch ans) > > This will synchronously wait for the job to finish. Presumably you'd > do this when you already started up the workers and from a context > where you have a lot of jobs running. > > Jay > > > > On Wed, Feb 1, 2017 at 2:21 PM, Dan Liebgold > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 at 10:38:05 AM UTC-8, Jay McCarthy wrote: >>> The typed-racket code returns a value from the job, whereas this code >>> assumes the job is fully self-contained. Perhaps job-queue should >>> protect itself from job exceptions. >>> >> >> BTW, how would you recommend returning a value from a job in job-queue? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Racket Users" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > > > > -- > Jay McCarthy > Associate Professor > PLT @ CS @ UMass Lowell > http://jeapostrophe.github.io > > "Wherefore, be not weary in well-doing, > for ye are laying the foundation of a great work. > And out of small things proceedeth that which is great." > - D&C 64:33 > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Racket Users" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Racket Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
