I'm definitively out of time right now. I'm priorizing debian requeriments right now, so changing build can be dramatic as long as each test takes a day or two in their farm.
And we want r2 updated asap, so we can get bokken ui and full bindings for python on w32, linux and osx packaged. --pancake On 14/10/2011, at 15:38, pancake <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for the work. > > This weekend I'll give a try to your patches. > > I plan to make a 0.8.8 release with some fixes reported by Debian and other > people.. yeah, > i know that people only tests final releases, so the 2 weeks for betatesting > was useless. > > I have defined some new things to be in the new release, and I dont want to > break > things. So I'll postpone the patches if I dont find them stable enought to > replace the > current build system. > > The new makefiles will be in the 0.9 for sure. i'm just wondering if they > will be in 0.8.8 > > Thanks! > > On 10/13/11 19:54, Glyn Kennington wrote: >> Glyn Kennington wrote: >>> Trying a different approach - here's a relatively small change that >>> switches some of the .mk files to use absolute paths, moves (most of) >>> the LDFLAGS setting out of binr/*/Makefile, and trims those unwieldy >>> replacement commands down to simple seds. >> And following that, some dependency order fixes and removal of redundant >> code in libr/*/t/Makefile, in order to keep the tests compiling. I >> haven't checked that they all do anything useful once compiled... >> >> Glyn >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> radare mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.nopcode.org/listinfo.cgi/radare-nopcode.org > > _______________________________________________ > radare mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.nopcode.org/listinfo.cgi/radare-nopcode.org > _______________________________________________ radare mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nopcode.org/listinfo.cgi/radare-nopcode.org
