Hi Kelly, A perfectly valid question. Although findglare isn't much used these days, that's no excuse for not having it work properly!
The -n, -u, -bv, and -m* options were added after findglare was created, and I apparently forgot to go back and add them. The other options (-I, -i, -h, and -e) are unsupported because they are not really appropriate for findglare. I have gone ahead and added in the missing options mentioned above and checked the changes into CVS. Thanks for pointing out this oversight! Best, -Greg > From: Kelly Moylan <km0...@brocku.ca> > Subject: [Radiance-dev] Possible bug in findglare? > Date: July 29, 2014 12:10:31 PM PDT > > I've been trying to use findglare using only an octree file, which as I can > understand from the docs requires the proper use of rtrace options in the > command. The problem I've run into is that some of the rtrace options the > findglare program will not take. My terminal is return the following line: > > Usage: findglare [view options][-ga angles][-p picture][[rtrace options] > octree] > > which I understand to mean that it believes I am using the program > improperly. The options which I have tried and found to not work are: -i, > -u, -I, -h, -n, -bv, -me, -ma, -e > > I'm not sure if this was on purpose because of the interaction between > findglare and rtrace. > > Thanks, > Kelly Moylan
_______________________________________________ Radiance-dev mailing list Radiance-dev@radiance-online.org http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-dev
