Hi Victor, I'm considering implementing equirectangular view for some of my own work, and before I start, I was wondering what the state of your implementation is and whether you might share it. Also, is this something that might work its way into the main Radiance distribution?
Happy new year, Nathaniel On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:09 AM, Victor LRG <[email protected]> wrote: > Rob, > > I have tried the last official release, so just 5.0. I'll try 5.0.a.12 to > see what happens. I have used the NREL Windows installers before and I had > no issues. > > The reason I wanted to compile Radiance myself is that I was playing > around with the source code and I wanted to try the changes. So far I have > incorporated an equirectangular view to rpict (see Radiance General October > 2016 Creating new view types for Radiance) and an additional option for > pextrem. They do seem to work fine in Linux, but unfortunately I not always > have access to a Linux machine. Therefore, it would be great to be able to > compile it for Windows. > > I'll have a look at the link to the commit. For now a was using the > CMakeLists.txt that came with the source code package with the following > modifications: > > cmake_policy(SET CMP0045 OLD) > SET(CMAKE_PREFIX_PATH “C:/Qt/5.7/msvc2015_64/lib/cmake/Qt5Widgets”) > SET(TIFF_INCLUDE_DIR “C:/Program Files (x86)/GnuWin32/include”) > > I'll try using the CMake/MSVC/libtiff/Qt versions you suggest to see if > that makes a difference. > > Many thanks, > > Victor > > > > > On 22 December 2016 at 14:39, Guglielmetti, Robert < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> What¹s the vintage of the source code? There were a couple of minor >> patches to the 5.0 official release (Mid-September), and the last tag that >> builds for Windows for me is the 'NREL 5.0.a.12¹ tag: >> >> https://github.com/NREL/Radiance/releases/tag/5.0.a.12 >> >> >> You could try the Windows installers we have, which seem to be working: >> >> https://github.com/NREL/Radiance/releases/download/5.0.a.6/ >> radiance-5.0.a.6 >> -win64.exe >> <https://github.com/NREL/Radiance/releases/download/5.0.a.6/radiance-5.0.a.6-win64.exe> >> https://github.com/NREL/Radiance/releases/download/5.0.a.6/ >> radiance-5.0.a.6 >> -win32.exe >> <https://github.com/NREL/Radiance/releases/download/5.0.a.6/radiance-5.0.a.6-win32.exe> >> >> I also Œget¹ wanting to roll your own, though. Again you¹d need to make >> sure your source aligns with this commit, or earlier: >> https://github.com/NREL/Radiance/commit/0c842736bf2b0908ba0e >> a42963ea8f4680c >> d1fc5 >> <https://github.com/NREL/Radiance/commit/0c842736bf2b0908ba0ea42963ea8f4680cd1fc5> >> >> And for the record, that NREL Windows build used Cmake 3.3.2, MSVC 12 >> 2013, a libtiff I rolled myself with 4.0.4-beta, and Qt5.3. >> >> The NREL packages aren¹t bulletproof, I¹m finding, but xform and oconv >> seem to work fine. It¹d be potentially mutually beneficial for you to try >> the NREL package on your input and see what happens. Or, send me your test >> input and we can go from there. >> >> - Rob >> >> >> On 12/22/16, 5:15 AM, "Victor LRG" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >Dear all, >> > >> >I amtrying to compile Radiance 5R0 for Windows using Cmake 3.7.1 x86 and >> >MVSC 2015 v14 with libtiff 3.8.2 and qt-x86-2.0.4. The compilation >> >finished with no errors (although some 1700 warnings), but when I am >> >trying a simple test >> > I get the following error with ovonv: fatal - (!xform >> >objects/cage_sphere2.rad): bad arguments for polygon "311s1m134f". This >> >object has the following description, which seems right to me: >> > >> > >> >cage_sphere polygon 311s1m134f >> >0 >> >0 >> >9 -0.833925170898 0.506038208008 0.096073600769 >> > -0.819481933594 0.473128112793 0.0903565139771 >> > -0.853187255859 0.492587890625 0.0980178833008 >> > >> > >> > >> >In VS I can see the following warnings regarding oconv and xform: >> > >> > >> >C4273 'erf': inconsistent dll linkage >> >C4273 'erfc': inconsistent dll linkage >> > >> > >> > >> >They both refer to rtmath.h file, which I guess they should refer to >> >erf.c as well? Actually, this warning also appears for most projects. >> >I've compiled and used the same package in linux before with no problem. >> > >> > >> >Any ideas? >> > >> > >> >Thanks >> > >> > >> >Victor Lopez-Rioboo Gil >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Radiance-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Radiance-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-dev > >
_______________________________________________ Radiance-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.radiance-online.org/mailman/listinfo/radiance-dev
