Hi, I have been using Radiator, authenticating and accounting via SQL,  for
about a year now and it works very well.  Depending on your perl skills you
can have/make radiator do just about anything that you want.  In answer to
your questions (anyone else on the list, please feel free to correct me ;)

1) I believe the source would have to modified to calculate and add a
"Session-Limit" which would cause your NAS to disconnect the user at your
end-time, from a quick glance it looks like it would take 3 or 4 lines (ok,
I know there is someone out there who can do it in one :) in AuthGeneric.pm.

2) The log files are standard livingston format detailing every attribute
sent in the acct packet.  Again, I believe you would need to modify the
source to only log certain attributes to a flat file, however you can define
the attributes to log if you are detailing to an SQL database as we do.

3) We have no regrets about purchasing radiator, it has to be the most
flexable auth solution free or commercial, especially if you can modify perl
code.

Good luck with your project...

Kevin
Sofnet, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Barnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Radiator List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, September 21, 1999 10:07 AM
Subject: (RADIATOR) evaluator questions...


>I'm currently evaluating Radiator to be used as our radius server.  I like
>what I see so far, but I do have three questions.
>
>1) I'm trying to figure out if I can set a time limit an account is allowed
>to be on.  I know that I can set "windows" when an account can connect, but
>suppose I have an account that can connect Mon-Fri 8am-5pm (normal business
>hours).  What happens if that account connects on Wed at 4:55pm.  Unless
>they hang up, there's no way to make them disconnect at 5pm.
>
>2) Is there a way I can control what info gets written out to the detail
>file?  I'm currently using an old version of Livingston radius, and the
>records written out to the detail file are not as detailed.  I like many of
>the new entries I'm getting in the detail file using Radiator, but I don't
>really need to know details like:
>
>USR-Simplified-MNP-Levels = ccittV42
>USR-Simplified-V42bis-Usage = ccittV42bis
>Acct-Input-Octets = 287
>Acct-Output-Octets = 266
>Acct-Input-Packets = 13
>Acct-Output-Packets = 12
>
>I'm using USR HiperARC chassis (and some older NetServs).  I'm doing
"AuthBy
>DBFILE" and have Nocache specified.  Also, running on Solaris 2.5.1 (just
>trying to give as much info upfront )
>
>3) My final question is "Is there anybody on this list that regrets
choosing
>Radiator".  I've read through some of the archives, and I've seen some of
>the normal complaints I would expect to see with any product.  I'm leaning
>heavily towards purchasing it, but I figure I should ask the community of
>users who use it everyday, and get their opinion.
>
>
>===
>Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
>To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
>'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.
>


===
Archive at http://www.thesite.com.au/~radiator/
To unsubscribe, email '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' with
'unsubscribe radiator' in the body of the message.

Reply via email to