Ack. Sorry, I figured it out. My environment was set in a development
mode that limits requests. *bonks self* Sorry for wasting peoples
time.
On 6/20/06, Jason Hummel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried using 'get' as well, and it doesn't seem to make a difference.
The actually come on the database end right, as it crunches through a
many millions of records, which is why I wanted to make these requests
through ajax. I was hoping to keep the page from slowing down by
making these as separate requests, allowing people to do other things
if they didn't have a need for the data.
On 6/20/06, Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> var call1 = new Ajax.Updater(
> 'id1',
> '/foo1.html',
> {
> method: 'post'
> });
>
> var call2 = new Ajax.Updater(
> 'id2',
> '/foo2.html',
> {
> method: 'post'
> });
>
> Looks like there's no parameters. Would method: 'get' perform any better?
>
> 3 seconds? Is there a network problem or a large chunk of data?
>
> Sam
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Rails-spinoffs mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
>
_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
