On 6/20/06, Jason Hummel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Ack. Sorry, I figured it out. My environment was set in a development
mode that limits requests. *bonks self* Sorry for wasting peoples
time.
On 6/20/06, Jason Hummel <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> I tried using 'get' as well, and it doesn't seem to make a difference.
> The actually come on the database end right, as it crunches through a
> many millions of records, which is why I wanted to make these requests
> through ajax. I was hoping to keep the page from slowing down by
> making these as separate requests, allowing people to do other things
> if they didn't have a need for the data.
>
> On 6/20/06, Sam < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > var call1 = new Ajax.Updater(
> > 'id1',
> > '/foo1.html',
> > {
> > method: 'post'
> > });
> >
> > var call2 = new Ajax.Updater(
> > 'id2',
> > '/foo2.html',
> > {
> > method: 'post'
> > });
> >
> > Looks like there's no parameters. Would method: 'get' perform any better?
> >
> > 3 seconds? Is there a network problem or a large chunk of data?
> >
> > Sam
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Rails-spinoffs mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
> >
>
_______________________________________________
Rails-spinoffs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
_______________________________________________ Rails-spinoffs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.rubyonrails.org/mailman/listinfo/rails-spinoffs
