On 2010-08-23 21:43, Martin Christensen wrote: > On 2010-08-23 21:16, Anders Brander wrote: > >> How about not renaming everything? Just let rawstudio-daily >> conflict/replace the rawstudio-package? >> >> > Seconded. Generally more than one version will not be needed by most > users. Those who need an older, stable version will easily be able to > install in another location, e.g. /usr/local, from source. By all means, > keep packaging as simple as reasonably possible. > I don't like this idea, the daily package is build directly from svn at a random time between commits (fixed time each day) - if code hasn't been tested enough it will break usage of Rawstudio for users wanting to try the latest but not compile it themself. They need to have a stable version (the regular package) to fall back to if they need to use Rawstudio and the daily package is broken...
/Anders _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-dev
