Will upload a file as soon as I get a decent connection .. am 'on the road' right now. Any place special to send the RAW file?
David On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 18:00 +0200, Klaus Post wrote: > Hi! > > The lens-fix is actually there to correct for inconsistent meta-data. > Let me explain: > > The "aperture" you see there is the minimum reported aperture of your > lens, which is used for identification. This is a bit tricky, since > variable aperture lenses report the minimum aperture at the current > focal length. > > The important part is, that this is only relevant in identifying your > lens, so that you don't have to re-select it for every photo. The > "fix" file is there to make sure that your lens is uniquely > identified. > > So it shouldn't affect the sliders in any way, since you shouldn't > even have to select a lens for them to work. Could you upload a sample > file? > > > Regards, Klaus Post > > http://www.klauspost.com > > > On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 16:03, David Vincent-Jones > <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Anders; > > This sheds some light ... I think (dimly). > > My lens is on your 'lens_fix.xml' list: > <lens id="131" min-focal="17" max-focal="70" make="Canon"> > <name>Sigma 17-70mm f/2.8-4.5 DC Macro</name> > The camera Canon 50D is also on the camera list. > > So all should work correctly. > 1.) Although it is really not important, the 'Lens Editor' > should not > report the Aperture as f4.2 for the image when it really is > f8.0. > The aperture is being read directly from the RAW file I would > guess. > 2.) Since the lens is listed then the Lens correction sliders > should > work. At one time I am sure (again dimly) that they did > function. > > If this is a case where you need an actual image to solve the > problem I > can try and get a small JPG to you (if that helps, or must it > be a RAW) > but I am travelling and on a terrible (worse than dial-up) > connection so > it may take a few days. > > David > > > > On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 15:01 +0200, Anders Kvist wrote: > > Hi David > > > > Think this is the solution you are looking for :) > > > > http://rawstudio.org/blog/?p=541 > > > > /Anders > > > > > > > > On 2011-05-27 14:46, David Vincent-Jones wrote: > > > Hi Klaus; > > > > > > Ran through the terminal and all looks clean. No error > messages. > > > > > > Opened the 'Rawstudio Lens Editor' .. didn't look > before ... see the > > > Editor thinks image was shot at f4.2 .. incorrect it was > shot at f8.0. > > > In fact the Editor thinks that all of my images were shot > at f4.2 > > > > > > Then looked in the lens library and find my lens is > apparently multiply > > > installed from f2.8 through f4.5 (in 1/3 increments ?) 10 > times but > > > nothing beyond that f4.5 aperture. > > > > > > I was not aware that every differing aperture needed to > have a new > > > entry. > > > > > > David > > > > > > On Fri, 2011-05-27 at 12:37 +0200, Klaus Post wrote: > > >> Hi! > > >> > > >> The temperature will reset to "As Shot" neutral converted > through the > > >> input profile, so it may vary slightly from the kelvin on > your camera, > > >> and slightly if you change the profile, but it should > give the most > > >> accurate representation of the white balance selected on > the camera. > > >> > > >> Are there any lens-related error messages in the console? > > >> > > >> Regards, Klaus Post > > >> > > >> http://www.klauspost.com > > >> > > >> > > >> On Fri, May 27, 2011 at 11:01, David Vincent-Jones > > >> <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> I notice that when I 'reset' the Tint, the > Temperature is also > > >> reset ... > > >> is there a reason? The base Temperature setting > of 5650 > > >> appears unusual > > >> vs. other programs also the setting of 9 for the > Tint .. did > > >> you have > > >> something special in mind? Not problems, only > questions! > > >> > > >> Previously Reported ..I still have a problem with > the Lens > > >> Correction: > > >> I am using a 'Sigma 17-70 mm f/2.8-4.5 DC Macro'. > The lens is > > >> correctly > > >> applied but none of the correction slider > functions are > > >> working. My lens > > >> is correctly listed. (RS 2.0 on Ubuntu 10.10) > > >> > > >> I am "in the field" at this time and processing > substantial > > >> image > > >> batches on a laptop. Rawstudio is a real > life-saver; thank > > >> you. > > >> > > >> David > > >> > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Rawstudio-users mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> > http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users > > >> > > >> _______________________________________________ > > >> Rawstudio-users mailing list > > >> [email protected] > > >> > http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Rawstudio-users mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > > http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Rawstudio-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > > http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Rawstudio-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users > > > _______________________________________________ > Rawstudio-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-users mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users
