There is no difference between the 2 images ... tiff and png My problem lies in trying to manage the different formats. I use Digikam for management purposes (were that there was an alternative) and would have liked to be consistent regarding file formats. I do also use Darktable for some colour work. I use png from Darktable and have used this output form from all other programs in the past ... all with png that included compatible metadata including tags, ratings etc. It appears that I need to use tiff output from RS in order to have both exif data as well as tagging information which then would bring some degree of harmony to my files. I was always under the impression that tiff was not 'universal' in its format ... possibly I have been mis-informed in this matter.
David On 3/6/12, Anders Brander <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 17:01 +0100, David Vincent-Jones wrote: >> When I display png exports from RS in other programs the lack of colour, >> date, tagging and other information creates display and sequencing >> problems. > > Do I understand this correctly? The image looks wrong? Is there a visual > difference between TIFF and PNG? > > /abrander > > _______________________________________________ > Rawstudio-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users > _______________________________________________ Rawstudio-users mailing list [email protected] http://rawstudio.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rawstudio-users
